They say love has many faces, adding complexity to abstraction. The word has lost its boundaries being so arbitrarily used to mean many different things. People refer to love widely from stating preferences of things to declaring profound human relations. Love is used to symbolize friendship, or asentimental relation; to state appreciation, or make a commitment; to make a compliment or even decline a request.
In the context of this article, I am referring to the positive emotions that bind humans and create fulfillment, security, and completeness of some kind. More specifically, I am referring to feelings one holds for another person that underlie our desire to make them and ourselves happy; and in doing so we feel generally good about ourselves.
Thinking about that definition of love, is it logical to assume that we love because a person has certain qualities that we appreciate and so our feelings of fulfillment, security, and completeness are provoked? In other words, we would not love some one who does not make us feel good about ourselves or does not help us reach that state, would we? Likewise, can we further assume that it would take some time for that person to actually prove deserving, prior to our loving them? If it were true, we would only love worthy people by virtue of who they are and how they are.
Unfortunately, this is unlikely to be true as people fall in and out of love all the time. Presumed friendships end. Relationships come to term and people get hurt. They get hurt, as they discover more about themselves and their needs; and about how those who they claim to be their closest souls turn out to be and make them feel over time.
I used to believe that despite being rare, unconditional love was a higher form of emotions. I confused it at times with the notion of giving without expectations and regarded this as a noble gift not every one is capable of giving. I was wrong.
Unconditional love is meaningless. It is a sign of constant imbalance between the giving and receiving of love which is unfair to start with. Giving some one love genuinely is invaluable. But giving love regardless of whether or not others value what they are receiving is actually selfish of the giver as well as the receiver. It is selfish because it invites people to misbelieve that regardless of how self centered, irresponsible, or inconsiderate their behaviors are; they will be granted love. Eventually, that form of love is in vain and negatively affects every one involved.
Love that is given unconditionally eventually derives feelings of disappointment, frustration and some times guilt to the giver. When some one is dedicated in their giving despite being unappreciated, they feel bad about themselves. Over time, the initial feelings of tenderness are overshadowed by anger, resentment and hurt. Those feelings contradict with the default position of generally feeling good about oneself and others. Thus it is not love at all.
On the other side, the person who receives love unconditionally and gives little or none in return, is not motivated to develop themselves or their behaviors. They get used to taking what they have not earned. Rarely, does any one place a lot of weight on things that come free in life and often people take it for granted, neglect it and devaluate it. Love that is received unconditionally derives emotional abuse. Thus it is not love at all.
The statement “love is blind” is disempowering and suggests that we have absolutely no control over our emotions and that regardless of how unworthy a person is, how abusive a relationship is that we still continue to love any ways. How can someone claim to love another person and bear the thought of their unhappiness or hurt? How can that be love? A love that is blind, is not love at all.
Love is not blind, people are; sometimes. People want to avoid being hurt at any cost, and so choose to be blind assuming that things are what they want them to be not what they really are. People continue to compromise and tolerate unacceptable situations in hope that they can make things work. The sad thing is that time lapses at the expense of their own happiness.
Love is a verb, not just a feeling. It must be earned and must be mutual. That is not to suggest that some kind of quantification must be applied but rather a balance in the exchange of positive emotions that aim at happiness for those involved. A balance that makes people feel good about themselves. That is love.
“Endeavour to give what you desire for your self”. This call is for fairness, and it is an invitation for fair love.